Technical Reference #1639
Glass Bottom Culture Dishes
Citation in paper containing MatTek reference:
glass bottom culture dishes (MatTek Corporation; Ashland; MA; USA) 
1639. |
In Situ Characterization of Nitrifying Biofilm: Minimizing Biomass Loss and Preserving Persepctive
Robert Delatolla; Nathalie Tufenkji; Yves Comeau; Danidel Lamarre; Alain Gadbois; Dimitrios Berk,
McGill University,
Water Research,
43(1639),
(2009)
Abstract:
Methods for characterizing nitrifying bacteria within biofilms are of key importance to understand and optimize the nitrification kinetics of attached growth treatment facilities.In this work we propose an analytical protocol based upon environmental s Keywords:
biofilm; nitirification; wastewater; ESEM; CLSM; FISH; nitrobacter; nitrosomonas; biomass Materials & Methods:
2.1. Biofilm samples
The biofilms analyzed in this study were sampled from two
laboratory-scale nitrifying BAF up-flow reactors. The nitrifying
biofilms were grown on 3.8 1.2 mm diameter hydrophobic
polystyrene bead substrata (Veolia Water Paris
France) within laboratory reactors. The temperature within
the reactors was 20 C; the hydraulic retention time (HRT)
ranged from 1 to 4 h depending on the influent concentration
of ammonia the superficial velocity was maintained at
21 mm/min with a recirculation pump the pH was between
7.2 and 7.8 and the dissolved oxygen (DO) ranged between 6
and 7 mg/L. The design of the laboratory reactors allowed the
removal of the substratum from the reactor with minimum
disturbance to the biofilm. Synthetic wastewater (SWW)
solution was used to provide nutrients and ammonia to the
biofilm within the reactors. The SWW was composed of
Na2CO3$H2O (44 mg/L) FeSO4$7H2O (80 mg/L) ethylenediamine
tetraacetic acid (EDTA) (178 mg/L) KH2PO4 (5833 mg/L)
NaH2PO4 (463 mg/L) CaCl2$2H2O (30 mg/L) MgSO4$7H2O
(178 mg/L) MnCl2$4H2O (0.1 mg/L) Na2MoO4$2H2O (0.05 mg/L)
CuSO4$5H2O (0.01 mg/L) ZnSO4$7H2O (0.05 mg/L). The
ammonia concentration within the laboratory reactors was
maintained at 5 mg-N/L while the feed stream was devoid of
NO2
NO3
and carbon. The laboratory reactors were allowed to
run for a period of approximately 6 months before the
analytical examination of the biofilm commenced. It should
be noted that for simplicity different beads were used for the
ESEM analysis and the CLSM FISH analysis. However the
protocol presented here could readily be carried out such that
beads analyzed by ESEM are subsequently analyzed by
CLSM FISH.
2.2. SEM sample preparation and image acquisition
Ten polystyrene beads with attached biofilm were fixed with
2.5% gluteraldehyde for 3 h. The samples were then rinsed in
phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and placed consecutively in
vials containing 50% 70% and 96% ethanol for 20 min at each
concentration. Following dehydration the samples were
critical point dried using carbon dioxide as the transitional
fluid instead of air drying to maintain the stability of the fixed
structures. The samples were attached onto viewing stages
and sputter coated with gold in order to prevent static buildup
during viewing of the samples. The samples were imaged on
the SEM microscope (Philips XL30 FESEM).
2.3. ESEM image acquisition
Ten polystyrene beads with attached biofilm were removed
from the laboratory reactor and 100 ESEM images were taken
without storage or preparation (Hitachi S-4300SE/N ESEM).
The samples were placed directly onto a viewing stage and
subsequently placed inside the microscope vapor chamber.
The gaseous phase within the vapor chamber was water
vapor. Samples were analyzed for up to 20 min at 20 Pa before
the biofilm began to dry within the vapor chamber and the appearance of the biofilm was affected. Secondary electron
detection mode was used to capture high resolution topographic
images of the biofilm while backscattered electron
detection mode was used to capture images of exposed bead
surface and biofilm with higher contrast. The two detection
modes were used interchangeably balancing resolution and
contrast. Images between the 250 and 500 optical magnifications
proved ideal for quantification of the biofilm percent
coverage and thickness.
2.4. ESEM image analysis
The percent coverage of the biofilm on the bead and the
thickness of the biofilm were quantified from the ESEM
images using the image analysis software Vision Assistant 7.1
(National Instruments LabView 8.0). The integrated threshold
function was used to segment the pixels of a grayscale ESEM
image into two binary categories a biofilm category and the
background (bead surface) category. All pixels that fell within
the grayscale range defined as the biofilm interval were
assigned a value of one. All other pixels within the background
interval were set to zero. The thickness of the biofilm on the
beads was also quantified from the ESEM images. Sample
images were captured such that the curvature of the bead
allows the final extent of the biofilm to be digitally measured
relative to the surface of the bead. Vision Assistant 7.1 was
used to measure the biofilm thickness.
2.5. FISH reference cells
Pure cultures of the ammonia oxidizing bacterium (AOB)
Nitrosomonas europaea (ATCC no. 25978) and of the nitrite
oxidizing bacterium (NOB) Nitrobacter sp. (ATCC no. 25384)
were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection
(ATCC) Rockville MD USA. The pure cultures were inoculated
and maintained in ATCC culture media recipes no. 2265 and
no. 480 respectively. Both cultures were maintained in
a shaker at 26 C. Nitrosomonas cultures were monitored every
three days to maintain the pH between 7.2 and 7.8 with sterile
5% Na2CO3. Nitrobacter cultures were monitored weekly for
nitrite accumulation to prevent inhibition conditions. The
pure Nitrosomonas and Nitrobacter cultures served as controls
to test the hybridization of the oligonucleotide probes.
2.6. FISH oligonucleotide probes
The following rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes were
used. (1) EUB338 a probe that anneals to the rRNA of all
bacteria was used in this study as a positive control for
hybridization efficiency; (2) NON338 a complementary probe
to EUB338 that is incapable of annealing to the rRNA of
bacteria was used in this study as a negative control; (3)
NSO190 a probe specific to all known beta-subclass
ammonia-oxidizing proteobacteria was used in this study to
hybridize ammonia oxidizing bacteria (Nitrosomonas) and (4)
NIT3 a probe specific to Nitrobacter spp. The oligonucleotide
probes were synthesized labeled with fluorescent dyes and
purified by MWG Biotech Inc. Huntsville AL USA. The
labeling fluorophores used were indocarbocyanine dye CY5
indocarbocyanine dye CY3 indocarbocyanine dye CY3 and
fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) for the oligonucleotide
probes EUB338 NON338 NSO190 and NIT3 respectively. The
probe sequences the specificity the attached fluorophores
and the hybridization conditions are listed in Table 1.
2.7. FISH sample preparation
Ten whole bead substrata samples with the attached biofilm
were subjected to the in situ hybridization procedures of
Amann et al. (1990) and Manz et al. (1992). Modifications to the
procedure were introduced in order to hybridize the entire
substratum with the attached biofilm as opposed to removed
biofilm fragments attached to a microscope slide. A 30 gauge
syringe (Fisher Scientific Ottawa ON Canada) was pushed
into the polystyrene bead so that the sample (i.e. the bead
substratum with the attached biofilm remaining intact) could
be manipulated and controlled by the syringe staff attached to
the bead thus eliminating the potential effects of tools
coming into contact with the biofilm and thereby conserving
the integrity of the biofilm around the exterior of the bead. The
portion of the bead substratum influenced by the syringe was
negligible with respect to the total surface area of the bead
leaving greater than 95% of the bead surface area intact and
available for analysis. The samples were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde
for 1 h at 4 C by submerging the bead into
a 2 mLvial of paraformaldehyde. During this process care was
taken to ensure that the samples did not contact the sides or
bottom of the vial. The samples were then rinsed in PBS and
placed in vials containing 50% 70% and 96% ethanol at 4 C for
3 min at each concentration. Hybridization with two probes
was performed on each sample in subsequent steps by first
hybridizing with the probe of higher stringency (Wagner et al.
1994). All hybridizations were performed by placing the
samples within vials containing the hybridization buffer and
the probe at 46 C for 90 min. The hybridization buffers were
composed of 0.9 M NaCl 20 mM trishydroxymethylaminomethane–
hydrochloric acid (Tris–HCl) 0.01% sodium dodecyl
sulfate (SDS) and a probe-specific formamide percentage as
indicated in Table 1. The probe concentration within the
hybridization buffer for each of the four probes used in this
study was 5 ng/mL. Hybridization was followed by rinsing the
samples with a washing buffer and placing the beads within
a vial containing the washing buffer at 48 C for 20 min. The
washing buffers consisted of 20 mM Tris–HCl 5 mM ethylenediamine
tetraacetic acid (EDTA) 0.01% SDS and a probespecific
NaCl concentration as shown in Table 1. Following the
washing step the bead samples were air dried rinsed with
sterile distilled water and stained with 46-diamidino-2-phenylindole
(DAPI 1 mg/ml) for 10 min in the dark. The samples
were then rinsed with sterile distilled water air dried and
mounted on glass bottom culture dishes (MatTek Corporation
Ashland MA USA) in GelTol mounting medium (Fisher
Scientific Ottawa ON Canada). The samples were stored at
4 C in the dark for up to a week until examined.
2.8. FISH image acquisition
Hybridized samples of the bead substratum with the attached
biofilm were analyzed using a Zeiss LSM 510 META confocal
laser scanning microscope equipped with an argon laser (458 nm 477 nm 488 nm 514 nm) diode laser (405 nm) and
two HeNe lasers (543 nm 633 nm). The HeNe laser (543 nm)
and BP 560–615 filter was used to excite and emit the CY3
fluorophore; the HeNe laser (633 nm) and LP 650 filter was
used to excite and emit the CY5 fluorophore; the argon laser
(488 nm) and the BP 505–530 filter was used to excite and emit
the FITC fluorophore; and the diode laser (405 nm) and the LP
420 filter was used to excite and emit fluorescence from the
DAPI stain. A 63 oil immersion lens was used to view and
capture 1.0 mm thick 207 207 mm optical sections. Five
sections with vertical intervals of 2–6 mm between each
section were acquired within the biofilm at randomly
selected adjacent locations to produce a stack of images that
can be combined to produce a visual 3D representation of the
biofilm at each specific location and can ultimately be used to
determine the average cell numbers per volume of biofilm. In
this study a thickness of 1.0 mm was chosen for each section
based on the value corresponding to the approximate mean
cell diameter for Nitrosomonas and Nitrobacter populations
(Sharma and Ahlert 1977). The intervals between the acquired
sections were chosen depending upon the specific thickness
of the biofilm at the location of interest; particularly the first
of the 5 sections was acquired at the substratum/biofilm
interface and the final section was acquired near the external
limit of the biofilm (the biofilm/liquid interface when the bead
sample was within the reactor).
The whole-cell identification efficiency of the NSO190 and
NIT3 specific probes were tested using pure cultures of N.
europaea and Nitrobacter sp. Each sample of pure culture was
hybridized with the NSO190 NIT3 EUB338 and NON338 in
addition to being stained with DAPI. NSO190 EUB338 and
DAPI allowed 99.3 2.5% 99.0 2.6% and 99.5 1.5% of the N.
europaea cells to be identified respectively. Only 0.1 0.3% and
0.1 0.2% of the pure culture cells of N. europaea were falsely
identified using NON338 and NIT3 respectively. NIT3 EUB338
and DAPI allowed 98.8 2.8% 98.3 3.4% and 99.0 2.6% of
the Nitrobacter cells to be identified respectively. Only
0.1 0.3% and 0.5 1.2% of the Nitrobacter cells were falsely
identified using NON338 and NSO190 respectively. In addition
to inefficient hybridization the ability to quantify the bacterial
community within biofilm using FISH with rRNA-targeted
oligonucleotide probes can be compromised by (1) limited
probe permeability of the target bacterial cells (2) low cellular
rRNA content of the bacterial cells or (3) background fluorescence
(Amann et al. 1995). In situ hybridization of the biofilm
samples with the EUB338 NSO190 and NIT3 probes along with
DAPI staining demonstrated that all the probes and the dye
were able to penetrate to the complete depth of the biofilm
and that the bacterial cells contained a sufficient rRNA
content to be readily visualized. The accessibility of the cells
at the substratum/biofilm interface to the DAPI stain and to
the oligonucleotide probes was confirmed by staining cells
with DAPI and hybridizing with the EUB338 probe. Specifically
the fact that DAPI and EUB338 illuminated the same cells is an
indication of good probe permeability. It was further
confirmed that the cells located at the substratum/biofilm
interface were able to be hybridized with NSO190 and NIT3 by
comparing the total number of cells at the substratum/biofilm
interface stained with DAPI with the total number of cells
hybridized with NSO190 and NIT3. The small average thickness
of biofilm (35 mm) associated with the samples used in
this study is believed to be advantageous in terms of probe
penetration through the film. Thus the study of the applicability
of this protocol to thicker heterotrophic biofilms from
municipal treatment plants is of interest for future studies in
our laboratory. The intrinsic fluorescence of the bead surface
and the biofilm (background fluorescence) can produce false
positives or mask hybridized cells during analysis. Thus
NON338 probe hybridization and hybridization without
probes were used to measure the detector gain amplifier gain
and amplifier offset settings of the confocal microscope that
produced background fluorescence emission of the bead
surface and/or the biofilm used in this study. The testing
phase of this study was subsequently conducted below the
detector gain amplifier gain and amplifier offset values that
correlate to background fluorescence effects of the samples.
2.9. FISH image analysis
The size and distribution of the bacterial colonies the percent
coverage of the bacterial colonies with respect to the biofilm
and the cell count of the ammonia oxidizing bacteria and the
nitrite oxidizing bacteria were quantified from 200 digital
CLSM images. The size and distribution of the ammonia
oxidizing colonies and the nitrite oxidizing colonies were
measured using the software package that accompanied the
Table 1 – Probe sequences specificity attached fluorophores and hybridization conditions used for the rRNA
oligonucleotide probes used in this study.
Probe Probe sequence Specificity Fluorophore Hybridization conditions Reference
Formamide
concentration (%)
NaCl
concentration (mM)
EUB338 GCT GCC TCC
CGT AGG AGT
Bacteria Cy5 20 0.225 Amann et al. (1990)
NON338 ACT CCT ACG
GGA GGC AGC
Non-binding Cy3 20 0.225 Schramm et al. (1996)
NSO190 CGA TCC CCT
GCT TTT CTC C
Ammoniaoxidizing
bacteria
of the beta-subclass
of the Proteobacteria
Cy3 55 0.020 Mobarry et al. (1996)
NIT3 CCT GTG CTC
CAT GCT CCG
Nitrobacter spp. FITC 40 0.056 Wagner et al. (1994) confocal microscope (Zeiss LSM Image Browser Version 4.2).
The percentage coverage and cell count of the ammonia
oxidizing and nitrite oxidizing bacteria were determined using
the same software used for the ESEM image analysis (Vision
Assistant 7.1). The threshold analysis function of NI Vision
Assistant was used to segment the illuminated cells of interest
from the rest of the CLSM image. This procedure was followed
for the ammonia oxidizing bacteria and subsequently for the
nitrite oxidizing bacteria. The segmented pixels corresponding
to the cells of interest were then quantified and expressed
as the percentage coverage of the image area and/or enumerated
and expressed as the number of cells per image. The
threshold values used in this study were calibrated separately
for each probe. The number of cells within a defined area of an
image was first manually counted and secondly quantified in
terms of pixels by adjusting the threshold value in order to
generate the correct pixel number that corresponded to the
counted number of cells. The agreement between the manually
counted cells and the cells counted by the threshold
analysis determined from an additional 20 analyzed images
was 106.1 17.1% and 101.8 8.1% for ammonia oxidizing
bacteria and nitrite oxidizing bacteria respectively. Microscopic Technique
Confocal Microscopy, Laser Scanning Confocal Microscopy Cell Type(s)
europaea |